A striking cover image if I've ever seen one. The use of text as the primary means of communication, as opposed to a photograph or illustration, is intriguing to me. And the words on that Time cover are arresting.
This cover story came to be after "the Managing Editors of Time, People, Sports Illustrated, Fortune and Essence all went with the company's Managing Ed to New Orleans in early May. As Time mag's Richard Stengel explains, they went there to talk, to listen and to report on what's been going on there since Katrina." And while the other publications had elements within their pages devoted to the aftermath of Katrina, Time magazine took the most aggressive stance and dedicated the most column inches.
The twelve-page cover story got the attention of many bloggers. Some of their thoughts are below:
I like the article, mostly, with some reservations that I don't have time to explain now. It begins with the strongest and most direct statement about the Federal Flood that I've seen in a national publication. If anything, the article nearly overstates the extent to which the catastrophe in New Orleans was a "man made" disaster, and I never ever thought I'd see that. Thanks to Michael Grunwald for writing this story.
I am so pleased that a national news magazine is telling this story. Maybe now folks in the rest of the country will "get it".
...
The article is well done. Grunwald did his homework before writing his story, which is more than I can say for other prestigious journalists. I don't agree with every single statement in the story, but he mostly gets it very right.
Time magazine usually is a pretty tepid slog through mainstream opinion, however, the August 1st issue has a no-holds-barred article that pretty much calls the New Orleans rebuild what it is: a pathetic misguided, mismanaged boondoggle...that won't do much to protect the city's residents from future storms.
The article is particularly strong in its articulation of the importance of wetlands to shielding New Orleans and coastal residents from future storms. Wetlands have a variety of very important functions we depend on; it's hard to argue with the primacy of the role of storm defense.
This week’s cover story in TIME magazine is all about the sad state of New Orleans two years after Hurricane Katrina.
Not to take anything away from the folks in New Orleans — Lord knows they tough it out to get from today to tomorrow — but, c’mon, Mainsteam Media Guys: get out of NOLA!
See also: Editor & Publisher's TIME Preview: New Orleans Still In Grave Danger As Hurricane Season Arrives
UPDATE: For a differing perspective, see the Army Corps of Engineer's repsonse to the Time article about rebuilding.

Thanks for the heads up, Brittney. Congratulations on your new blogging home. A focus such as this on magazines should give you plenty to talk about. Best wishes!
Posted by: Rob Robinson | August 09, 2007 at 01:04 PM
What an evocative cover. That would be such a blase photo on its own, but with the text, as you observed, it is powerful and chilling.
Posted by: Rob Robinson | August 09, 2007 at 01:05 PM
This may have been the first Time that I read from cover-to-cover in a lonnng time. The stunning reality that the Gulf may (yet) find its way to overcome New Orleans within the next decade stuck with me (obviously).
The shots at the Corp of Engineers were a bit disturbing, warranted or otherwise. I'd love to see a follow-up with better supporting information.
Posted by: Paul Chenoweth | August 09, 2007 at 03:11 PM
TIME magazine’s article, “The Threatening Storm,” undermines the real science and risk information citizens need to make informed decisions about rebuilding with its reckless disregard for the truth.
For more info and facts visit the listed url: http://www.usace.army.mil/response.htm
Posted by: Corps of Engineers Employee | August 13, 2007 at 12:37 PM