Jezebel.com reports that a spokesperson for W said the magazine "did not do anything unusual or out of the ordinary" to the photo and that "Demi is an extraordinary beautiful woman and we feel our cover reflects that."
Though we're not surprised W magazine's editors altered the photo, we are surprised this version made the cover. What do you think, is W's cover as bad as the bloggers say?
I think it's a photoshop job. She looks young - no wrinkles and all.
Posted by: E-procurement software | November 20, 2009 at 04:50 AM
Not bad lol I think a good photo shop jobby too !
Posted by: Maternity wear | November 24, 2009 at 07:52 AM
Follow the line of her left leg upwards, notice the gap beside her wrist where her hipbone should be? That's called a Photoshop Disaster. They just wanted her to look thinner but the retoucher went too far and has a bad eye.
Posted by: renfro | November 25, 2009 at 04:01 PM
Although the script she was assigned cygy6o secondary role, thanks to the appearance successfully found and accurately placed melodramatic accents, the name of Demi Moore remembered for many viewers. But really it has become famous thanks to the photographs in the magazine «Vanity Fair», which posed completely naked, her hands around her enormous belly (the seventh month of pregnancy!). In 1992, she repeated this trick, starring half-dressed, but in a man's jacket and hat. This image was taken extremely ambiguous.
Posted by: viagra online | April 05, 2010 at 03:05 PM
Hi guys.Although the script she was assigned cygy6o secondary role, thanks to the appearance successfully found and accurately placed melodramatic accents, the name of Demi Moore remembered for many viewers. But really it has become famous thanks to the photographs in the magazine «Vanity Fair», which posed completely naked, her hands around her enormous belly (the seventh month of pregnancy!). In 1992, she repeated this trick, starring half-dressed, but in a man's jacket and hat. This image was taken extremely ambiguous
Posted by: buy cialis | April 22, 2010 at 10:48 AM
Right, they did not do anything unusual, after all what magazine doesn't photoshop their covers? It's not the first time someone is missing a body part due to inept touchups.
Posted by: graphics tablet pen | May 12, 2010 at 07:23 AM
Yes, the cover definitely reflects... the shadows from photoshop. Even if Demi Moore is a beautiful woman indeed she does not look like that and let's not pretend we don't see it on the cover.
Posted by: web designer | May 13, 2010 at 07:35 AM
Demi more chick is pretty sexy!
Posted by: viagra | June 25, 2010 at 12:50 PM